Most protégés begin as instructors' pets, the sort of understudies whose report cards say "a joy to have in class" and whose educators from evaluation school through master's level college recollect that them as affectionately as they recall their instructors. To fit the bill for the position of a bona fide protégé, nonetheless, a profundity of power and closeness that goes past the part of most loved understudy needs to create. The hopeful must be seen as the conveyor of a guide's legacy and, in especially charged cases, even personality—an expert, scholarly, and mental beneficiary.
These connections are constantly more entangled than basic courses of action for the giving and accepting of good guidance and are more unstable than they show up. They are a valuable, significant, and to a great degree convincing assortment of affection, and in that capacity are sown with pitfalls for both members. Since both sides are amalgams of guardian/youngster, beau, and companion, the potential for significant satisfactions, and for pulverizing disillusionments, is implicit. As in every personal association, transferences and projections2 in both headings, and in addition unfulfilled and unfulfillable longings of various types, are undercurrents—the desire to remember one's childhood, to have impediments in your way whisked easily away by another person, to control the future, to have your labor of love propagated unaltered, to be respected or propelled without inner conflict. Despite the fact that these bonds can transform into organizations, fellowships (or adversary ships), competitions, and even relational unions, amid the underlying stage, they are by definition never connections of equivalents; there is dependably an understood force differential. Regardless of the fact that they keep going sufficiently long for the couple to wind up close companions, echoes of the first progressive system never altogether blur; they resound for a lifetime.